Post by nijhumnishita033 on Jan 11, 2024 8:56:38 GMT
(Photo: The memory of bread) Despite the above, the TSJ of Catalonia considered that the disease really existed and that it was centered on the activity of the company itself. In particular, in the opinion of the Social Court, the work that the worker carried out in the bar was not harmful nor did it delay his recovery . For this reason, the Court ended up declaring the dismissal to be inadmissible . Well, having described the contrast scenario, the Social Chamber of the TS confirms that, in the case analyzed " the contradiction does not occur, because the assumptions are different ."
The High Court emphasizes that in the appealed ruling "the plaintiff's desire not to return to work in Barcelona is proven , because she had previously expressed this on various occasions, and because after Phone Number Data retracting the announced resignation, and accepting it, the company and told him to return to Barcelona, he was sick leave due to IT and remained in Benicasim carrying out delivery tasks with his brother's van. On the other hand, “ such circumstances do not occur in the case of contrast ,” warns the Fourth Chamber. In fact, it is proven that the illness that caused her temporary disability really existed and that the tasks performed by the worker during the sick leave did not harm her recovery.
In short, the Social Chamber of the TS agrees to reject the appeal for the unification of doctrine filed by the representation of the dismissed worker and declares the finality of the sentence handed down by the TSJ of Catalonia. In the words of the Madrid lawyer, “as a labor activist, many come to mind: what period does the trial usually take? What is the judge like during the trial (if he lets people speak, if he pressures to close a conciliation)? The problem is that this information is not, today, accessible to everyone, and we can only know it if we have already had some experience of our own, or through that of a colleague." This is where “JusticiApp” comes in.
The High Court emphasizes that in the appealed ruling "the plaintiff's desire not to return to work in Barcelona is proven , because she had previously expressed this on various occasions, and because after Phone Number Data retracting the announced resignation, and accepting it, the company and told him to return to Barcelona, he was sick leave due to IT and remained in Benicasim carrying out delivery tasks with his brother's van. On the other hand, “ such circumstances do not occur in the case of contrast ,” warns the Fourth Chamber. In fact, it is proven that the illness that caused her temporary disability really existed and that the tasks performed by the worker during the sick leave did not harm her recovery.
In short, the Social Chamber of the TS agrees to reject the appeal for the unification of doctrine filed by the representation of the dismissed worker and declares the finality of the sentence handed down by the TSJ of Catalonia. In the words of the Madrid lawyer, “as a labor activist, many come to mind: what period does the trial usually take? What is the judge like during the trial (if he lets people speak, if he pressures to close a conciliation)? The problem is that this information is not, today, accessible to everyone, and we can only know it if we have already had some experience of our own, or through that of a colleague." This is where “JusticiApp” comes in.